Association of white blood cell parameters with metabolic syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 168,000 patients.

BACKGROUND: Leukocyte parameters are predicted to be affected in patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to study the association between white blood cell parameters (WBC) in people with and without MetS. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases were searched according to the study protocol. The standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of leukocyte markers between individuals with and without MetS were pooled using an inverse variance model. Additionally, a subgroup analysis by sex was performed where possible. Methodological quality assessment was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for observational studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs). RESULTS: Of 6068 articles identified, 63 were eligible for the study. Compared to controls, individuals with MetS showed significantly higher concentrations of total leukocyte count (SMD [95% CI]: 0.60 [0.55-0.65]; P < .00001; I2 = 100%), neutrophil counts (0.32 [0.28-0.37]; P < .00001; I2 = 99%), lymphocyte counts (0.15 [0.07-0.23]; P = .0004; I2 = 100%), basophil counts (0.01 [0.00-0.02]; P = .02; I2 = 98%), monocyte counts (0.05 [0.02-0.09]; P = .003; I2 = 99%), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (0.24 [0.15-0.33]; P < .00001; I2 = 98%). There were no significant differences in the eosinophil count (0.02 [-0.01 to 0.05]; P = .19; I2 = 96%) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (0.06 [-0.05 to 0.17]; P = .27; I2 = 100%) between patients with and without MetS, however, the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (0.52 [-0.81 to -0.23]; P = .0005; I2 = 52%) tended to be significantly lower in patients with MetS. CONCLUSION: Biomarkers such as total leukocyte count, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, basophil count, monocyte count and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio are associated with higher levels in patients in MetS and thus can potentially be used for early detection of MetS.

Association of Red Blood Cell and Platelet Parameters with Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 170,000 Patients.

This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to establish associations between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and erythrocyte and platelet markers, contributing to improved diagnostic tests for identifying individuals at risk. Observational studies and Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) were included. The standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of erythrocyte and platelet markers between individuals with and without MetS were used as effect size (inverse variance model). Methodological quality assessment was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for observational studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 for RCTs. The analysis included 51 articles. Compared to controls, individuals with MetS exhibited significantly higher concentrations of mean red blood cell count [Standardized Mean Difference (95% CI): 0.15 (0.13-0.18); p<0.00001], hemoglobin [0.24 (0.18-0.31); p<0.00001], blood platelet count [5.49 (2.78-8.20); p<0.0001], and red blood cell distribution width [(0.55 (0.05-1.04); p=0.03]. Regarding mean platelet volume [0.16 (- 0.03 to 0.35); p=0.10] and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) [7.48 (-2.85-17.81); p=0.16], a non-significant difference was observed in patients with MetS. There was no statistically significant difference in hematocrit counts between the two groups [0.47 (-0.40 to -1.34); p=0.29]. Biomarkers such as mean red blood cell count, hemoglobin, blood platelet count, and RDW are associated with higher levels in patients in MetS, whereas mean platelet volume and PLR tend to be lower. These markers can potentially provide new avenues for early diagnosis of MetS.

Efficacy and safety of bedaquiline and delamanid in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Multi and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis is a grave cause of global public health concern due to its high mortality and limited treatment options. We conducted this systemic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bedaquiline and delamanid, which have been added to the WHO-recommended regimen for treating drug-resistant tuberculosis. Electronic databases were searched from their inception until December 1st, 2021, for eligible studies assessing the efficacy and safety of bedaquiline and delamanid for treating drug-resistant tuberculosis. Binary outcomes were pooled using a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model and arcsine transformation and reported on a log scale with a 95% confidence interval (CIs). Twenty-one studies were shortlisted in which bedaquiline, delamanid, and a combination of both were administered in 2477, 937, and 169 patients. Pooled culture conversion at 6 months was 0.801 (p < 0.001), 0.849 (p = 0.059) for bedaquiline and delamanid, respectively, and 0.823 (p = 0.017), concomitantly. In the bedaquiline cohort, the pooled proportion of all-cause mortality at 6 months was reported as 0.074 (p < 0.001), 0.031 (p = 0.372) in the delamanid cohort, and 0.172 in the combined cohort. The incidence of adverse events in the bedaquiline cohort ranged from 11.1% to 95.2%, from 13.2% to 86.2% in the delamanid cohort, and 92.5% in a study in the combined cohort. The incidence of QTC prolongation reported in each cohort is as follows: bedaquiline 0.163 (p < 0.001), delamanid 0.344 (p = 0.272) and combined 0.340 (p < 0.001). Our review establishes the efficacy of delamanid, bedaquiline, and their combined use in treating drug-resistant tuberculosis with reasonable rates of culture conversion, low mortality rates, and safety of co-administration, as seen with their effect on the QTc interval.

Efficacy of statins in treatment and development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and steatohepatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) is one of the most common causes of chronic liver disease worldwide. There is no universally accepted effective treatment for NAFLD. Although various studies propose statins effective in lowering liver enzymes and in improving liver histology, their potency in the treatment and development of NAFLD remains unknown. PURPOSE: We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of statins in the treatment and the development of NAFLD. METHODS: Electronic databases (MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL) were searched from their inception until May 2021 for observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the efficacy of statins for the treatment of NAFLD and its development. Studies were included irrespective of the dosage or duration, and their risk of bias was assessed. The outcomes of interest for our study were the effect of statins on liver histology (steatosis, fibrosis and necroinflammation, NAFLD activity score [NAS]) and liver enzymes (Alanine transaminase [ALT], Aspartate transaminase [AST], and Gamma-glutamyl transferase [GGT] levels). To pool continuous outcomes, a random-effects model was used to derive weighted mean difference (WMD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Generic inverse variance was then used for different measurement units reported by the studies. For studies investigating the effects of statins on the development of NAFLD, generic inverse variance along with random effects model was used to derive odds ratio (ORs) and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: A total of 14 studies including 1,247,503 participants were short-listed for our analysis. All the studies included in our analysis had a low to moderate risk of bias. The results of our analysis suggest that statins may significantly reduce the risk of developing NAFLD (OR:0.69, 95% CI [0.57,0.84]; p = 0.0002; I² =36%). Statin use significantly reduced ALT levels (WMD: -27.28, 95% CI [-43.06, -11.51]; p = 0.0007; I² =90%), AST levels (WMD: -10.99, 95% CI [-18.17, -3.81]; p = 0.003; I² =79%) and GGT levels (WMD: -23.40, 95% CI [-31.82, -14.98]; p < 0.00001; I² = 21%) in patients presenting with NAFLD at baseline. In liver histology outcomes, steatosis grade (SMD: -2.59, 95% CI [-4.61, -0.56]; p = 0.01; I² = 95%), NAS (WMD: -1.03, 95% CI [-1.33, -0.74]; p < 0.00001; I² = 33%), necro-inflammatory stage (WMD: -0.19, 95% CI [-0.26, -0.13]; p < 0.00001; I² = 0%) and significant fibrosis (OR:0.20, 95% CI [0.04, 0.95]; p = 0.04; I² = 97%) underwent notable reduction. However, fibrosis stage outcome (WMD: 0.07, 95% CI [-0.05, 0.20]; p = 0.27; I² = 0%) was non-significant. CONCLUSION: There was a significant decrease in transaminase and transferase levels. Marked improvement in liver histology of NAFLD patients was observed. Statin use also remarkably reduced the risk of developing NAFLD. Future large-scale trials can further aid in identifying the positive impact of statins in treatment for NAFLD and those at risk of developing it.